• Login / Join
  • About
  • •
  • Contact
  • •
  • Advertising
bustler logo
bustler logo
  • News
  • Competitions
  • Events
  • Bustler is powered by Archinect
  • Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

  • Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • Search

    Search in

  • Submit

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event
  • Login / Join
  • News|Competitions|Events
  • Search
    | Submit
    | Follow
  • Search in

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event

    Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • About|Contact|Advertising
  • Login / Join

Bat House Project Announces Winners

By Bustler Editors|

Monday, Oct 29, 2007

THE OVERALL WINNER:

Jorgen Tandberg and Yo Murata
The winner in the Student/General Public Category was selected as the overall winner, to be built at the WWT London Wetlands Centre. Congratulations to Mr Jorgen Tandberg and Ms Yo Murata, who are 4th year undergraduate students at the Architectural Association.


The unanimous favourite through every round of voting, this design raised palpable excitement in the room. Beautiful, poetic and unexpected, combining state-of-the-art technology with a rural and romantic aesthetic. . Resembles a picture in a frame and can work on all four sides. Can be used year round – good for Pipistrelles. Rock pile at base would retain humidity. Good range of internal sizes. The location is ideal – it successfully negotiates the relationship between the tree-covered bank, where bats can fly out into cover, and the lake where certain species will feed, and where the water will keep the lower space cool and humid. Relationship to the viewing points and the wider site is strong.

The materials are simple and can be sourced locally, cheaply and from recycled supplies or even on site. The scale and design look reasonable for the budget available. The orientation and the different materials can be used to create the range of temperatures required – a certain amount of experimental development will no doubt be needed, but it is a highly adaptable design and could be adapted in situ over time. Could imagine it being replicated elsewhere, perhaps altering the materials and/or scale to suit each location and budget.

Catagory A Winners

First Prize:
Andrew Brown, Gareth Jones & James Falconer

A strong abstract design with varied potential for use. Good division between cold and warm areas. Modules of different conditions could be used for experimentation.

Joint Runner-Up:

Jochen Rabe (Arup) with Stefan White (Manchester School of Architecture) and Mike Wells (Biodiversity by Design)

Clearly based on extensive research on bats, catering for different species and based on sound knowledge. Highly successful for this reason. One of few entries to show how different species of bats might fly in and around the structures.

Joint Runner-Up:
Mitchell Taylor Workshop and Buro Happold

One of the strongest entries from an architectural point of view, this entry truly embraced the challenge of designing for a new typology. It attempted to combine suitability for bats with an experimental, modular approach to design and construction, using a limited palette of materials.

Category B Winners

First Prize of Category B and overall winning entry:
Mr Jorgen Tandberg & Ms. Yo Murata

Second Prize:
Tilman Ruben Winter

Red bricked cube reminiscent of Mario Botta / Jean Nouvel. Good design, would sit well on the site and attract visitors. Strong relationship between visitor zone and bat zone. The need for several types of roosting spaces was addressed.
Third Prize:
Alexander Bartscher & Elisabeth Deutschmann

Visually great, gothic/fairytale imagery, beautifully – taking the traditional house and separating a range of roosting spaces are provided.

Category C Winners

First Prize:
Miss Inderjit Mehroke

What looks at first like a purely fantasy illustration turns out on closer inspection to provide very well for the requirements of several species of bats. Lots of hard work, imagination and attention to detail have gone into this design.

It shows how a fantastic building, which the designer herself might wish to live in, can be adapted in many different and creative ways to accommodate bats. A protected courtyard of trees and ivy on the walls are provided for the bats should they prefer not to live in the building itself.

Second Prize:
Alexander Craig-Thompson

Serious thinking about architecture, considers viewing and what would go on inside in order to accommodate bats.

Third Prize:
Matthew Burns

Conceptually interesting, strong and clear idea. The Jury liked the idea of a ‘Big Brother’ observatory – ‘but no bats get evicted’. Sustainable materials, the use of new technologies and the relationship between humans and bats have been well considered.

Source: Bat House Project Offical Website

See also: Jury Report (PDF)

Related

results

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Bat House Project Announces Winners

40 emerging architects and designers under 40 from Europe honored

Northwestern University selects 12-firm longlist to design new engineering building

New architecture and design competitions: Exploring 130 Years of American Design, Christo & Jeanne-Claude Center, 13 White Houses, and La Pyramide

Micro-architecture honored in latest Tiny House Architecture Competition

World’s most beautiful restaurants of 2026 chosen by Prix Versailles

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design a wine tasting room in Italy! Valli Wine Tasting Room is launched!

10 can't-miss architecture & design events to see this June in London, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, Detroit, San Diego, Porto, and Barcelona

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Museum of Emotions / Edition #8 FINAL registration deadline is approaching!

Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

Seven global projects make AR Public Awards shortlist 2026

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design a slow-living restaurant in Portugal! Portugal Long Table Restaurant is launched!

World's best tall buildings honored at the CVU 2026 Award of Excellence

Sponsored Post by TWOPAGES

Final call: TWOPAGES X Design Contest 2026 submissions close June 5

Kengo Kuma & Paul Raff win Alberta national park visitor center competition with landscape-focused design

2026 Moira Gemmill and MJ Long prizes announced by W Awards

New architecture and design competitions: Kinderspace, Stewardson Keefe LeBrun Travel Grant, SMALL PROJECT BIG IMPACT, and Garden of University House, Bucharest

Next page » Loading

Bat House Project Announces Winners

By Bustler Editors|

Monday, Oct 29, 2007

Share

Related

results

THE OVERALL WINNER:

Jorgen Tandberg and Yo Murata
The winner in the Student/General Public Category was selected as the overall winner, to be built at the WWT London Wetlands Centre. Congratulations to Mr Jorgen Tandberg and Ms Yo Murata, who are 4th year undergraduate students at the Architectural Association.


The unanimous favourite through every round of voting, this design raised palpable excitement in the room. Beautiful, poetic and unexpected, combining state-of-the-art technology with a rural and romantic aesthetic. . Resembles a picture in a frame and can work on all four sides. Can be used year round – good for Pipistrelles. Rock pile at base would retain humidity. Good range of internal sizes. The location is ideal – it successfully negotiates the relationship between the tree-covered bank, where bats can fly out into cover, and the lake where certain species will feed, and where the water will keep the lower space cool and humid. Relationship to the viewing points and the wider site is strong.

The materials are simple and can be sourced locally, cheaply and from recycled supplies or even on site. The scale and design look reasonable for the budget available. The orientation and the different materials can be used to create the range of temperatures required – a certain amount of experimental development will no doubt be needed, but it is a highly adaptable design and could be adapted in situ over time. Could imagine it being replicated elsewhere, perhaps altering the materials and/or scale to suit each location and budget.

Catagory A Winners

First Prize:
Andrew Brown, Gareth Jones & James Falconer

A strong abstract design with varied potential for use. Good division between cold and warm areas. Modules of different conditions could be used for experimentation.

Joint Runner-Up:

Jochen Rabe (Arup) with Stefan White (Manchester School of Architecture) and Mike Wells (Biodiversity by Design)

Clearly based on extensive research on bats, catering for different species and based on sound knowledge. Highly successful for this reason. One of few entries to show how different species of bats might fly in and around the structures.

Joint Runner-Up:
Mitchell Taylor Workshop and Buro Happold

One of the strongest entries from an architectural point of view, this entry truly embraced the challenge of designing for a new typology. It attempted to combine suitability for bats with an experimental, modular approach to design and construction, using a limited palette of materials.

Category B Winners

First Prize of Category B and overall winning entry:
Mr Jorgen Tandberg & Ms. Yo Murata

Second Prize:
Tilman Ruben Winter

Red bricked cube reminiscent of Mario Botta / Jean Nouvel. Good design, would sit well on the site and attract visitors. Strong relationship between visitor zone and bat zone. The need for several types of roosting spaces was addressed.
Third Prize:
Alexander Bartscher & Elisabeth Deutschmann

Visually great, gothic/fairytale imagery, beautifully – taking the traditional house and separating a range of roosting spaces are provided.

Category C Winners

First Prize:
Miss Inderjit Mehroke

What looks at first like a purely fantasy illustration turns out on closer inspection to provide very well for the requirements of several species of bats. Lots of hard work, imagination and attention to detail have gone into this design.

It shows how a fantastic building, which the designer herself might wish to live in, can be adapted in many different and creative ways to accommodate bats. A protected courtyard of trees and ivy on the walls are provided for the bats should they prefer not to live in the building itself.

Second Prize:
Alexander Craig-Thompson

Serious thinking about architecture, considers viewing and what would go on inside in order to accommodate bats.

Third Prize:
Matthew Burns

Conceptually interesting, strong and clear idea. The Jury liked the idea of a ‘Big Brother’ observatory – ‘but no bats get evicted’. Sustainable materials, the use of new technologies and the relationship between humans and bats have been well considered.

Source: Bat House Project Offical Website

See also: Jury Report (PDF)

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Archinect JobsArchinect Jobs

The Archinect Job Board attracts the world's top architectural design talents.

VIEW ALL JOBS POST A JOB

Project Architect / Senior Designer

Touloukian Touloukian Inc.

Project Architect / Senior Designer

Boston, MA, US

Architectural Job Captain

Christopher Courts Inc.

Architectural Job Captain

Los Angeles, CA, US

AutoCAD Drafter/Architectural Designer

Kari Whitman Interiors

AutoCAD Drafter/Architectural Designer

Boulder, CO, US

Architectural Designer

jones | haydu

Architectural Designer

San Francisco, CA, US

Junior to Intermediate Architect

Totum

Junior to Intermediate Architect

Sherman Oaks, CA, US

Interior Designer, 5+ Years Experience

Cass Calder Smith

Interior Designer, 5+ Years Experience

San Francisco, CA, US

Intermediate Architect

FROM Architecture DPC

Intermediate Architect

New York, NY, US

Senior Project Architect

Breland – Harper

Senior Project Architect

Los Angeles, CA, US

Job Captain / Project Manager

Breland – Harper

Job Captain / Project Manager

Los Angeles, CA, US

Associate - Interior Designer

FitzGerald Associates Architects

Associate - Interior Designer

Chicago, IL, US

Next page » Loading