BIG and Michel Rojkind Win Cultural Competition in Mexico
Posted: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 | ↓ 2 comments
Share/Save:    Bookmark on Bustler Save this  &  del.icio.us Favicon   Digg Favicon   Facebook Favicon   Google Bookmarks Favicon   NewsVine Favicon   StumbleUpon Favicon   ThisNext Favicon   Email this



Danish architects BIG, together with Michel Rojkind Arquitectos, have won the competition for the New Tamayo Museum which is to be build right outside of Mexico City. Based on the concept of an “opened box” which unfolds into a cross shape, the Museo Tamayo will occupy a hillside overlooking the city.

image

Here is how 
the architects explain the project:

Set upon a steep hillside in Atizapan on the outskirts of Mexico’s largest metropolis will soon sit the New Tamayo Museum which will serve as a nucleus of education and culture, locally, regionally, and internationally. Named after the Oaxacan born artist Rufino Tamayo (1899-1991) The very strong and symbolic shape of the cross is a direct interpretation of the client’s preliminary program studies that defined the museums optimal functionality.

image

image

The main concept of MUSEO TAMAYO EX-TENSION ATIZAPAN is an “OPENED BOX” that unfolds, opens and invites the visitors inside. Package, restoration and storage will serve as additional cultural spaces for visitors to understand the stages that an art piece goes through in order to get to its specific destination. This is a very direct, strong and symbolic project. Where the shape derives from the client’s preliminary studies that defined the optimal functionality and was then enhanced by taking advantage of the best views from above, making the best of the steep terrain and shading the more social program below, exterior and interior spaces overlap to provide the best environment possible for each function, and optimal climatic performance.

image

image

image

Michel Rojkind, Rojkind Arquitectos:
Understanding that contemporary art spaces pretend to be more important than the art they contain, our proposal arises from the scheme of requirements previously studied by our clients, assuring maximum functionality in each area while focusing on the development of art projects. By enhancing the program and understanding the topography, a balance between form, function and visual impact for this important space was created. Once the functional part was improved, we could give attention to details that make the space not only a culture enclosure, but also a building that understands its surroundings to distinguish itself and transform from a simple form to a powerful symbol, controversial, but ideal to lodge this new space.

image

MUSEO TAMAYO EX-TENSION ATIZAPAN makes the best of the steep terrain allowing the galleries to shade the more social programs below, exterior and interior spaces overlap to provide the best environment possible for each function, and optimal climatic performance. The permeable brick shading façade eliminates or reduces the need for AC and combines good daylight with no sunshine and plenty of natural ventilation. Although, it will be the museums symbolic provocation of its form and content that will attract its visitors, once there, they will discover that its design, though modest, is intelligently and sustainably planned.

image

image

image

Bjarke Ingels, BIG Partner-in-Charge:
When you ask contemporary artists what kind of space they would prefer to exhibit their work in – they almost always describe old industrial warehouses or loft spaces. It is the kind of space where they have their studios, but most importantly the rough structures, with large spans and generous ceiling heights provides them with the maximum freedom of expression. On the other hand the museum director or the mayor might want an icon that to attract visitors.So museum design is often caught in a dilemma between the artists demand for functional simplicity and the museum’s (and architect’s) desire to create a landmark. The cantilevering cross is the literal materialization of the cruciform functional diagram – devoid of any artistic interpretation. MUSEO TAMAYO EX-TENSION ATIZAPAN becomes the embodiment of pure function and pure symbol at the same time.

image

The new Tamayo Museum Ex-Tension Atizapan Credit List:

ARCHITECTS BIG + ROJKIND ARQUITECTOS
CLIENT PATRONATO TAMAYO
SIZE 3;500 M2
LOCATION MEXICO
STATUS COMPETITION 1. PRIZE

BIG Architects
Partners-in-Charge: Bjarke Ingels & Andreas Klok Pedersen
Team: Pauline Lavie, Maxime Enrico, Pål Arnulf Trodahl

Rojkind Arquitectos
Partner-in-Charge: Michel Rojkind
Team: Agustín Pereyra, Monica Orozco, Ma. Fernanda Gómez, Tere Levy, Isaac Smeke, Juan José
Barrios, Roberto Gil Will, Joe Tarr

Structural Engineer:
Romo y Asociados

Landscape Design:
ENTORNO taller de paisaje

Graphic Design:
Ernesto Moncada

Visualization:
Glessner Group - Germán Glessner

Images: BIG/Michel Rojkind



Share/Save:    Bookmark on Bustler Save this  &  del.icio.us Favicon   Digg Favicon   Facebook Favicon   Google Bookmarks Favicon   NewsVine Favicon   StumbleUpon Favicon   ThisNext Favicon   Email this

Saved by: archidose, awhitershadeofpale, Paul Petrunia

Comments:
Architortured
Friday, May 08, 2009
I’m really skeptical, the intention to do such a “pure” attention-grabbing form seems to supersede considerations for the site, context, function and spatial experiences, it’s pretty simplistic and facile. The giant cantilever isn’t exactly new either, and I wonder how oppressive it feels *under* the large span - anyone who has ever walked beneath an elevated highway/freeway would know what I mean. Pity as the site looks spectacular. In all, it could have been a student’s studio project.


I also wonder if the cruciform is purely functional as described, it doesn’t allow for spatial flexibility leaving the museum with specifically sized rooms oriented in a destined manner, not good for a small museum. A longer plan would allow for greater planning flexibility and partitioning, one or many rooms, a continuous linear exhibition space if needed, etc.

The interior perspectives look terrible, no qualities, which isn't surprising as there isn't much else except boxes placed together in a cross.

More formal fashion parade
Global
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Do we really ever learn anything.

"The 1985 Mexico City earthquake, a magnitude 8.1 earthquake that struck Mexico on 19 September 1985 at 7:19 local time, caused the deaths of about 10,000 people and serious damage in the nation's capital. This earthquake had significant long-term political consequences for the country.[1] The complete seismic event consisted of four quakes. A pre-event quake of magnitude 5.2 occurred on 28 May 1985. The main and most powerful shock occurred 19 September, followed by two aftershocks: one on 20 September 1985 of magnitude 7.5 and the third occurring seven months later on 30 April 1986 of magnitude 7.0. The quakes were located off the Mexican Pacific coast, more than 350 km away, but due to strength of the quake and the fact that Mexico City sits on an old lakebed, Mexico City suffered major damage. The event caused between three and four billion USD in damage as 412 buildings collapsed and another 3,124 were seriously damaged in the city. While the number is in dispute, the most-often cited number of deaths is about an estimated 10,000 people.[2] The earthquake—apart from the aforementioned political consequences—had long-term social effects on the country."

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The day will come, when mother nature will strike back, reminding us of how stupid we really are.

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:
Comment:
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


  

Featured Competitions:
image
Register/Submit: Oct 22
image
Register: Oct 1 / Submit: Oct 15
image
Register: Sep 15 / Submit: Sep 30

Search News by Keyword:
Advertisement