Kaputt! Receives Honorable Mention for House of Arts and Culture Entry
Posted: Friday, April 03, 2009 | ↓ 6 comments
Share/Save:    Bookmark on Bustler Save this  &  del.icio.us Favicon   Digg Favicon   Facebook Favicon   Google Bookmarks Favicon   NewsVine Favicon   StumbleUpon Favicon   ThisNext Favicon   Email this



Just a few minutes ago, Bustler posted the news of Italian architect Alberto Catalano of Teknoarch winning the international competition to design the new House of Arts and Culture in Beirut, Lebanon.

Here’s another very exciting entry for this international competition by Portuguese studio Kaputt! that was awarded an Honorable Mention. Kaputt! was founded in Lisbon in 2004 by eight young architects.

image

Honorable Mention for Kaputt!‘s Beirut Proposal: Diving Perspective


This is how the architects explain their project:

In its course and struggle to animate its great civilization, another step is taken: Beirut constructs its House of Arts and Culture. People from Beirut and the world will come to reflect upon and distance themselves from everyday life and, influenced by its extraordinary atmosphere, come together in the creation of art and culture. The House of Arts and Culture is a place of reunion and exchange. It is always free, open to all, yet shelters and protects. Like in the courtyard of a caravanserai, we will find a breathing inhabited space and through its transparency we feel its pulses. The exterior spaces, open to the outside, are both part of the city and the House itself. The House is designed with present technology but is independent of it, something bigger. Something adaptive. Change is its name. This is not an office building.

image

Conceptual Diagram

image

Diagrammatic Distribution of Program

URBAN AND ARCHITECTURAL OBJECTIVES:

The project is designed from a single volume, a shell that at first occupies all the plot´s surface. From this shell, mass is removed around two perpendicular axes, thus, creating a cross-shaped void. The center of this void and the inside of the shell are structured by copper blades, generating four exterior spaces in the interior of the plot. At the end of this operation, the surface at ground floor level of the project takes 70% of the plot. The affirmative presence of the shell allows for the planned integration of the building within the urban grid planned for the location. Through the vegetation of the exterior spaces, one can see the copper blades on the interior facades. It is the difference of character of these two components, the peripheral shell in white concrete, heavy and compact, and the thin blades of copper, light and permeable, that define the project´s intention. Through the blades, one can see the fluidity of people throughout the whole building. The chosen materials will age and create a patina without changing their character, thereby, preserving the character of the whole building over time.

image

Site Plan

image

First Floor Plan

image

East Elevation

image

Longitudinal Section

PERFORMANCE AND CONFERENCE HALL:

For the main auditorium we propose a fully equipped proscenium stage; the small auditorium will have a black box character with a technical ceiling and movable seats to enable a vast choice of configurations; the projection room is prepared to serve the National Cinematheque. Theatre, dance, acoustic concerts and oratories are some of the most likely performances; Cinema projection, live concerts, congresses, conferences, seminars, etc. where electroacoustics will dominate the scene, are alternative activities for these spaces. Acoustics suited for live recordings and broadcasting connect it to the rest of the world. Large Performance and Conference Hall: Its shape can be read from the main exterior space through the copper blades. From the staircase it will be seen in all its amplitude. Here, one can understand that the acoustical shell is free of the covering roof. The Large Performance and Conference Hall aspires to be as encompassing as possible. The Hall´s layout consists of a series of fanned radial sections, centered on the stage, forming an ellipsoid in its entirety. Multipurpose usage for the Large Performance and Conference Hall as music and theatre require very different room acoustic properties (opposite material characteristics), raising the need to use interior variable acoustics. A box-in-a-box solution (double structure) must be applied to the main structural concept design at least for the performance halls and the movie theatre. These measures will isolate the buildings from external sources of vibration and noise.

image

Large Performance Hall

image

Exhibition Spaces

image

Facade Detail

Images: Kaputt!

Share/Save:    Bookmark on Bustler Save this  &  del.icio.us Favicon   Digg Favicon   Facebook Favicon   Google Bookmarks Favicon   NewsVine Favicon   StumbleUpon Favicon   ThisNext Favicon   Email this

Saved by: afsoon, archidose, diffmatt, InD, modus31, oxygene2, Paul Petrunia, vsolkul

Comments:
Jesse
Sunday, April 05, 2009
While this is quite a beautiful design, especially the copper and white concrete juxatposition, the accompanying text is very poorly written, and it is a very sad indicator for architecture if the best that architects can do to describe thier designs in words is restate the brief with vague attempts at poetic incomplete sentences. For example: "The House is designed with present technology but is independent of it, something bigger. Something adaptive. Change is its name. This is not an office building." To conclude with such a pathetic description of one's design, I would argue, does not give hope that the execution of said design will have any of the nuance that the graphics do. I understand Kaputt are Portugese and English probably isn't their native language, which may explain the horrific grammar and punctuation, but can't we as architects also demand that intelligent words and discourse accompany great design, or at least not glorify uninspired, banal writing? Or at least proofread text before you submit it?

Will
Sunday, April 05, 2009
Jesse, was that a joke?

Jesse
Monday, April 06, 2009
Uh, no man, I'm completely serious. Perhaps I'm being unfairly harsh with Kaputt, but its something I see on here in general, and I just think if you get an honorable mention in a huge international competition, you should have something smart, or at the very least original, to say. In a way, its the jury's responsibility just as much as the architect's.

I'd be interested to know why you thought that was a joke, but I understand if you dont care enough, I dont really care that much either, I just finally found the willingness to post a piddly comment.

linda
ny
Tuesday, April 07, 2009
i agree, jesse! this text is slightly disturbing as it fails to express the unique obvious design intentions. perhaps they are dancing around to avoid stating the obvious: this is a gash. as presented, this looks like a decent project with graduate school writing. they took a good chance with the design, and it worked! but, perhaps more compelling words would've gotten them more than an honorable mention...

Will
Thursday, April 09, 2009
You two are idiots.

linda
Friday, April 10, 2009
thanks for your words of insight (??) perhaps you, WILL, enjoy simply rephrasing trite competition briefs in your proposals? or do you just enjoy trying to offend people on architecture websites? both are pretty lame. if you have something intelligent to say, drop your elementary school commentary and PLEASE professionally express your opinion! i wasn't aware this website was in need of filtrating mindless comments...

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:
Comment:
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


  

Featured Competitions:
image
Register: Dec 1 / Submit: Jan 8
image
Register/Submit: Jan 27
image
Register: Jan 4 / Submit: Jan 6
image
Register: Dec 31 / Submit: Mar 1

Search News by Keyword:
Advertisement