REX’s Proposal for the Munch Area Competition in Oslo
Posted: Friday, April 03, 2009 | ↓ 8 comments
Share/Save:    Bookmark on Bustler Save this  &  Email this



Last week, Bustler reported on the winners of the international competition for the new Munch Area in Oslo’s waterfront neighborhood Bjørvika. The proposal “Yin Yang” by New York-based architecture firm REX won the second prize in this competition (together with the proposal “Girls on the Bridge” by Christ & Gantenbein, Switzerland and Lie Øyen Arkitekter, Norway).

Here’s a closer look at REX’s concept for “Yin Yang”:

image

2nd prize winner in Oslo: the proposal “Yin Yang” by REX

MUNCH MUSEUM AND STENERSEN MUSEUM COLLECTIONS
Oslo, Norway

CLIENT HAV Eiendom, Oslo Kommune
PROGRAM Art museum housing the Munch and Stenersen Collections, self-produced exhibitions, and travelling exhibitions
AREA 16,585 m² (178,520 sf)
PROJECT COST NA
STATUS Limited competition, second prize, 2009
ARCHITECT REX
KEY PERSONNEL Lee Altman, Haviland Argo, Gabrielle Brainard, Keith Burns, Alex Diez, Jeffrey Franklin, Javier Haddad, David Menicovich, Joshua Prince-Ramus, Jacob Reidel
CONSULTANTS José Miguel Iribas, Lord, Magnusson Klemencic, Transsolar

image

Daytime Rendering

image

Nighttime Rendering

Oslo recently celebrated the opening of its world-acclaimed Opera House, an important step in the city’s commitment to developing Bjørvika and to unifying Oslo’s eastern and western centres. With four more significant projects under development within the district—Oslo Central Station, the Barcode, the Deichman Axis and the Munch Area—Oslo must be wary of overwhelming Bjørvika with too many strong visual landmarks. Such a constellation would undermine the Opera’s iconographic power, and dilute the identity of the city as a whole.

image

The skylight and glass floor in the Munch Studios Gallery allow natural light into the administration rooms and the painting, paper, and sculpture studios.

image

To best complement the Opera, the Munch Museum should forge a new kind of iconography—one based on innovative building performance, not signature form—to command a significant place within Oslo’s mental landscape. Where the Opera is strong, REX’s “Yin Yang” proposal for the new Munch Museum is strategic, establishing itself as a worthy counterpart by radically addressing two cardinal challenges facing contemporary museum design.

image

Challenge 1: The new Munch Museum demands its galleries to be extremely flexible. They must accommodate all types of artistic idioms, to grow or shrink in accord with the number and size of temporary exhibitions, to be intimate or majestic, sky-lit or blacked out, permeable or soundproof. Contemporary museum flexibility is typically conceived as generic white boxes—a blank slate—in which any exhibition format can be constructed. In practice however, as artistic media grow more diverse and museum operational budgets become more limited, a blank slate becomes constrictive: museums can not afford to endlessly transform their generic galleries. The result is not freedom, but imprisonment within a white box.

Strategy 1: By embracing a new form of gallery flexibility, REX’s proposal for the new Munch Museum avoids this trap. Yin Yang offers complete flexibility—without increasing operational costs—by providing built-in tools. The galleries are arranged into an array of eight, distinct typologies, each with its own proportions, materiality, lighting, circulation and form of flexibility. While a museum with a single gallery type requires great expense to transform itself, the array’s range of galleries guarantees curatorial freedom regardless of budgetary constraints. It can accommodate a spectrum of curatorial visions and can be reconfigured, both with no future additional cost.

image

Manifested as a flexible array of distinct gallery types surrounded by a ring of public circulation, Yin Yang asserts a unique, performance-driven presence in Bjørvika while still deferring to the new Opera’s iconic power.

Challenge 2: The new Munch Museum requires a flexible circulation sequence capable of individually or simultaneously presenting the museum’s own collections, self-produced exhibitions and travelling exhibitions. The classic museum procession is a lobby that begins and ends a linear loop of galleries. This compulsory circulation causes major curatorial and operational problems for the institutions it organizes: they must use all their galleries at once and cannot easily subdivide their space for simultaneous shows. Institutions with this sequence have to continuously “feed the beast,” exhibiting blockbuster after blockbuster, and must support staffs capable of managing shows this size.

Strategy 2: The REX proposal for the new Munch Museum wraps all un-ticketed spaces into a public “ring” around the galleries. Rather than imposing a fixed procession on curators and patrons, this organization provides independent access to each gallery, or a procession through any plausible combination or permutation of galleries. The public ring—including shops, lecture hall, auditorium, café, restaurant, education spaces and sponsors lounges—doubles as the main circulation for the galleries, fostering new, dynamic relationships between the two and increasing area efficiency.

image

The walls of the Classical Gallery’s central hall are designed high enough to exhibit monumental works, such as Munch’s The Sun, Alma Mater, and The Human Mountain. Similarly, its floor is designed to display Munch’s delicate, oversized sketches that are too fragile to mount on stretchers. The Classical Gallery is closest to the main entrance, and if desired, can serve as the entrée to Munch’s work.

image

Three pavilions are based upon Munch’s studios at Ekely, Norway, and both the interiors and exteriors of the pavilions can be used for art display. One pavilion is open to the sky to simulate Munch’s outdoor painting studio. The glass floor around the pavilions provides sunlight to the administration rooms and the painting, paper, and sculpture studios below.

image

Following in the tradition of the house museum and the private collection (and in contrast to the Classical Gallery), the Villa Gallery provides space to display art in an intimate, domestic setting.

image

The unusual forms of the Shaped Gallery provide a foil with which—and against which—exhibitions and artworks can interact, similar to the spiral gallery of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York.

image

The Universal Gallery is one of three “Reconfigurable Galleries” in the array, utilizing a system of ceiling-mounted, movable panels for conventional art display. The ceiling grid is designed to hang large, heavy pieces of art as well.

image

The White Box Gallery provides a dedicated space that can accommodate large contemporary works of art. In the event that an even larger gallery is needed, the panelized side walls of the White Box Gallery can be easily stored within the installation room. This opens the White Box to the adjoining Universal Gallery and Accordion Gallery to create a contiguous 1,540 m² space—equivalent to the largest gallery spaces at many of the world’s leading museums. If desired, roll-down shutter doors open one side of the gallery entirely to the public ring.

image

The Accordion Gallery—the second of three “Reconfigurable Galleries”—is equipped with walls which can be moved laterally to create spaces of differing widths, a classical enfilade, or a large open room.

image

The third “Reconfigurable Gallery” is the Rotating Gallery, whose four walls can easily swivel to allow for rapid rearrangement.

image

By creating a flexible array of distinct gallery types and surrounding them with a ring of public circulation, Yin Yang asserts a unique, performance-driven presence in Bjørvika while still deferring to the new Opera’s iconographic power.

image

In the spirit of the Louisiana Museum of Modern Art in Humlebæk, Denmark, the public ring provides moments of repose with views to the fjord and city, and spaces adjacent to the galleries for the display of less sensitive artworks.

image

Close up of the lobby ring

image

Ground Level

image

Level 1

image

Transition from the lobby ring to the galleries

image

Overall Model Shot

image

Model View to Commons

image

Munch Area Master Plan

image

Similar to the proposed design of the Munch Museum, the three courtyard buildings use strategy—not signature form—to make a lasting, positive mark on their environs. Seemingly just three, simple, contemporary versions of Oslo’s urban fabric stepping down toward the water, they harbor secret gardens that stitch together the Aker River Commons and the Station Commons.

image

Each garden is distinct, aligned to the program of its container. The housing block contains a forest; the business center contains a piazza; and the hotel block contains a rustic seafront. Coincidentally, their contents also reference Oslo’s expression, “The blue and the green and the city in between.” The courtyard of the housing block contains a forest.

Images: REX



Tags for this entry:
new york, europe, usa, museum, norway, oslo, rex, stenersen, munch
Comments:
mike null
chicago
Saturday, April 04, 2009
I dislike this building, the name alone is a cliche, and the design follows suit. This building is a Schizo-Miesian mess...that if intentional, does not seem to hold it's irony. I understand, and appreciate the need for flexible space, but in this case, it is a theme park of different spaces within in a Miesian grid context, a horror show of different body parts, from various individual stuffed into a box.

Pedro Rojas
Buenos Aires
Saturday, April 04, 2009
yeah! it's a theme park. Mies was used just for an austere image. If no crisis, it wold be a blob

andrewbags
Italy
Sunday, April 05, 2009
The most interesting proposal among all entries. Who cares about the name! I appreciate the lobby's potential as a prolonged waterfront promenade for art experience. Also a further sloped connection could lead to the roof, maximising views on the surrounding and as a complement to the Opera's topography. Hope Oslo's municipality will choose this scheme cause we need hybrid collective space in the urban landascape more than other icons or art fortresses

claire
Sunday, April 05, 2009
rex continues to do 3rd year undergraduate projects with some graduate level renderings.

GrandMoffTarkin
Los Angeles
Sunday, April 05, 2009
Wow, shiny marble reminds me of a Tati set but not the Barcelona Pavillion.

Very interesting how the "...strategy, not signature..." argument is implemented in this proposal (I think I would go so far as to say that this argument is embodied in the design - barring of course obvious issues with exhibit staging, exit discharge, etc..).

In light of the Rec/Depression, I think it is compelling that REX reached this level at least partially on the basis that they're NOT giving the client/city/history something that relies on a singular and idiomatic image, but instead a structure which does it's job well, with a smile which is not irrationally exuberant.

As Mr. Ouroussoff has recently intoned: "It Was Fun Till The Money Ran Out".

Very clear diagram about how a museum functions. Probably should throw in another freight elevator for those galleries, though, right? (Just check your plans from the OMA LACMA competition....)

Good/Bad boy, REX!

troy!
Wednesday, April 08, 2009
omfg... die already.

ps - where did they even get the money for that model? clearly not from cut backs on what they pay their interns.

Henrik
Denmark
Wednesday, April 08, 2009
Very beautiful project!
Looks much more interesting then the winner.

M.O. Tundra
Thursday, May 14, 2009
A fair first prize for Juan Herreros.

The implementation is much more sophisticated than the rest of the contestants. A blurred piece, in height, perpendicular to the bay is a great success.

And programmatically is visionary. A museum developed in vertical is a more contemporary concept and therefore more appropriate.

The system of public spaces generated, in close relation with the building of the Opera, is a gift to the city of Oslo.

Anyway, I do not know which campaign is out there to discredit this project. We should be thinking about the citizens of Oslo and not in professional rivalries and commercial ambitions.

PS. Rex´s project blocks the view of the Opera and does not contribute to the visible image from the fiord that the city needs.

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:
Comment:
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Prove you're not a spammer by answering the following question:
What is between "Mies" and "der Rohe"?

  

Featured Competitions:
image
Register/Submit: Feb 17
image
Register/Submit: Feb 20
image
Register/Submit: Mar 1
image
Register/Submit: Mar 16

Search News by Keyword:
Advertisement