Facebook Twitter Pinterest
Winners of Redesigning Detroit: A New Vision for an Iconic Site
Posted: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 |

The international design competition Redesigning Detroit: A New Vision for an Iconic Site has announced its winners today. Hosted by the Opportunity Detroit campaign, the competition solicited ideas for a potential signature project on the former Hudson’s Department Store site in downtown Detroit.

The nine-week competition was a free, open call for architects, designers, planners, artists, and community members to present ideas for innovative, creative, and inspired designs for the potential future use of one of the city’s most iconic sites. The competition attracted nearly 200 entries from architectural and design firms, as well as individuals, from 23 states and 22 countries.

Entrants were asked to create compelling visions for a new urban development on the vacant 92,421 square-foot site, bordered by Woodward Avenue, Gratiot Avenue, Grand River Avenue and Library Street in the heart of downtown Detroit.

Detail of the competition-winning entry “MINICITY Detroit”

Click above image to view slideshow
Detail of the competition-winning entry “MINICITY Detroit”

From residential to retail, to concert venues and offices, the entries ran the gamut from a single story structure to a 1,000-foot high skyscraper, as entrants let their imaginations run wild. Some of the submissions pay homage to the original Hudson’s Department Store by including its likeness in their design; one submission literally turned the store upside down, another included a completely green, sustainable and energy efficient building, and yet another included all made-in-Michigan materials.

“The Hudson’s Department Store was once the crown jewel of downtown Detroit, and these interesting designs are displaying the possibilities of what can certainly once again grace the skyline of Detroit,” said Dan Gilbert, Chairman of Rock Ventures, one of the Opportunity Detroit partners. “By tapping into the talents of some of the most creative individuals from around the globe, we have the opportunity to create a signature project that captures the passion, grit and revival of our great American city.”

Reed Kroloff, who led the competition to design the “High Line” in New York City and is Director of the Cranbrook Academy of Art and Art Museum near Detroit, served as the competition’s advisor.

“The Hudson’s site represents a microcosm of Detroit’s 20th century muscle concentrated in and around one significant site,” said Kroloff.

“Detroit was and still is ground-zero for innovation in so many ways. For example, Hudson’s had one of the earliest Thanksgiving Day Parades, and its designers created stunning store windows that were among countless reasons Woodward Avenue was the place to shop and do business in Detroit.”

Juried Competition Winners

A panel of five distinguished architects and urban planning experts from across the country judged the entries. Redesigning Detroit awarded $15,000 for first place, $5,000 for second place and $2,500 for third place.

First Place: “MINICITY Detroit,” Davide Marchetti and Erin Pellegrino; Rome, Italy incorporates an urban path to an elevated platform and includes sculptural high-rise elements and low-rise components for a combined use of commercial, residential and retail space in upper and lower plazas. Other uses include a market space and cinemas. The design incorporates red brick found in much of the city’s historic architecture while complementing nearby buildings.

First Place - Jury Vote: “MINICITY Detroit,” Davide Marchetti and Erin Pellegrino; Rome, Italy

Click above image to view slideshow
First Place - Jury Vote: “MINICITY Detroit,” Davide Marchetti and Erin Pellegrino; Rome, Italy

Second Place: “Detroit Entrepreneurial Center (DEC),” Efrain Velez, Juan Nunez, Marko Kanceljak; Kalamazoo, Michigan is an eco-friendly mixed use development designed to promote a dynamic exchange among people and inspire innovation. It features a business incubator, marketplace, hotel and several housing options along with climate controlled common areas. The building honors Detroit’s industrial past and resembles the silhouette of past factories and “the material qualities of a rusted steel façade.”

Second Place - Jury Vote: “Detroit Entrepreneurial Center (DEC),” Efrain Velez, Juan Nunez, Marko Kanceljak; Kalamazoo, Michigan

Click above image to view slideshow
Second Place - Jury Vote: “Detroit Entrepreneurial Center (DEC),” Efrain Velez, Juan Nunez, Marko Kanceljak; Kalamazoo, Michigan

Third Place: “Highwave Detroit,” Team Rossetti/Metrogramma; Southfield (soon to be Detroit), Michigan proposes a building honoring the site’s significance for Detroit’s identity with a strong visual impact. Its triangular shape suggests a sail on a boat. Other materials include steel, concrete and glass, and a greener side featuring terraces with water views and reflecting pools at ground level. Functions include entertainment and event space, residential, retail and office space. 

Third Place - Jury Vote: “Highwave Detroit,” Team Rossetti/Metrogramma; Southfield (soon to be Detroit), Michigan

Click above image to view slideshow
Third Place - Jury Vote: “Highwave Detroit,” Team Rossetti/Metrogramma; Southfield (soon to be Detroit), Michigan

In addition to the three top submissions, the jury also awarded 10 Honorable Mention awards as well as three prizes for the top Family of Company entries.

Community Vote Winners

After the official judging ended on June 7, the public was invited to view and vote on the submissions as part of a special exhibit and community open house Saturday and Sunday June 8-9. The three submissions earning the most public votes won cash prizes of $2,500, $1,000 and $500 respectively for first, second and third places.

First Place: “Hudson’s Quarter,” Emilie M. Rottman and James G. Ramil; Washington DC, is a contemporary site for urban living designed to be a new “headquarters” for Detroit’s renaissance. It honors the original Hudson’s site and Detroit’s historical surroundings, and the building’s exterior includes an image of the original department store façade. Uses include retail, a gym, apartments and condos, a performance space and outdoor arts and a music alley.

First Place - Public Vote: “Hudson’s Quarter,” Emilie M. Rottman and James G. Ramil; Washington DC

Click above image to view slideshow
First Place - Public Vote: “Hudson’s Quarter,” Emilie M. Rottman and James G. Ramil; Washington DC

Second Place: “Exten(D),” Extending Life in the D, Beyond the 9 to 5, Smith Group JJR-Diana Khadr, Tengteng Wang, Alexa Bush, Kyle Johnson, Jessie McHugh; Detroit, Michigan, features amenities to attract and retain visitors and commuters in the urban core to show them what Detroit has to offer after hours. It includes residential space, offices, a grocery store, an M-1 RAIL stop, restaurants, an art gallery and green space.

Second Place - Public Vote: “Exten(D),” Extending Life in the D, Beyond the 9 to 5, Smith Group JJR-Diana Khadr, Tengteng Wang, Alexa Bush, Kyle Johnson, Jessie McHugh; Detroit, Michigan

Click above image to view slideshow
Second Place - Public Vote: “Exten(D),” Extending Life in the D, Beyond the 9 to 5, Smith Group JJR-Diana Khadr, Tengteng Wang, Alexa Bush, Kyle Johnson, Jessie McHugh; Detroit, Michigan

Third Place: “Blue Fountain Tower,” Salvador Parra Espinosa and Selene Serna Contreras, De San Bernadino; Toluca, Mexico, replaces 50 percent of the site’s current footprint with gardens that would be accessible at sidewalk level. It features retail, art galleries, offices, apartments, lofts, a school, gardens and terraces. Its designers call it an “icon for Detroit,” and its futuristic design features outdoor terraces designed for physical activity on 10 stories of the building.

Third Place - Public Vote: “Blue Fountain Tower,” Salvador Parra Espinosa and Selene Serna Contreras, De San Bernadino; Toluca, Mexico

Click above image to view slideshow
Third Place - Public Vote: “Blue Fountain Tower,” Salvador Parra Espinosa and Selene Serna Contreras, De San Bernadino; Toluca, Mexico

All submissions can be viewed in an online gallery here.



Comments:
Andre
Sunday, June 16, 2013
I think this just proves why the public should have no say in the selection of the winning schemes. The three 'public' voted winners are atrocious.

Featured Competitions:
image
Register: Sep 30 / Submit: Oct 21
image
Register/Submit: Sep 1
image
Register: May 25 / Submit: Jul 13
image
Register: Jul 6 / Submit: Jul 30

Search News by Keyword:
Advertisement