[Recovering Berlin] Design Competition
Register/Submit: Thursday, April 22, 2010
Share/Save:    Bookmark on Bustler  &  Email this



For the full brief and more information, please visit Protocol Architecture at protocolarchitecture.wordpress.com

On January 1st, 2040, Berlin, Germany will become the location of both the 6 month Presidency of the Council of the European Union and the yearly Cultural Capital of Europe. In order to mark this important moment for Berlin, the office of the Presidency of the Council of the European Union, in conjunction with Monsanto Corporation, are hosting an ideas competition for the design of an architectural system that can house the administrative programs of the Office of the Presidency while incorporating a new cultural program to address the mission of the Cultural Capital of Europe project.
Physical/Political Context – The Morphology of the EU

Moving every 6 months to a different member state, the location of the Presidency of the Council of the European Union is symbolic of the fact that Europe has no central capital. At the same time, it is also politically advantageous because it allows the host nation to set the agenda of the EU’s main law-making body according to national goals. In a similar way, the yearly designation of the European Capital of Culture is also financially important as a catalyst for the cultural development and transformation of the city.
As the EU/HQ’s host, Berlin will benefit from the opportunity to re-evaluate its particular cultural and political history. From fascism to communism, Berlin was the stage for many controversial political regimes in the 20th century, each of which left a distinct mark on the physical structure of the city. Often, however, the desire to move on has led to the systematic erasing of this history through new construction. Now, once again, the city must ask itself “which Berlin do we want to represent?”
Technological Context – Nano-robotics/Bio-technology

In addition to these cultural and political issues, the applicants are asked to address recent technological developments and their potential effects on the physical practice of architecture. In the past decade, the development of carbon-based nano-transistors has reached a consumer level, making the development of nano-robotics cost effective for small-scale architectural implementations. In addition, a new field of bacteria-based technology has uncovered a series of micro-organisms that can operate on the micro-level to affect structure.

This includes the Bacillus Pasteurii, which can solidify soil by turning sand into sandstone, and the Shewanella Bacteria, which naturally produces the carbon nano-tubes which have become the basis for all technology. When combined, these technologies have allowed the use of nano-robots to direct these natural bacterial processes to deploy not only material systems but also informational systems directly within the structure of the building. Working almost as a large-scale 3-d printer, this technology is able to build up and solidify both material and informational structure iteratively over time.
Programmatic Guidelines:

Office of the President of the Council of the European Union
- general assembly space for the Council conference rooms
- meeting rooms dedicated to education and training zone for identification processing
- -areas of restricted access for confidential materials
- rooms with simultaneous interpretation and translation
- events that would be extended to global audiences

Media Gallery
- exhibition space to serve as an interface between the public and the Council
- dedicated space for gatherings, film screenings, and public addresses
- mediateque/digital library as an accessible cultural archive and research center

Competition Guidelines
Entries must address the following important issues of the project:

Institutional Identity – The reconciliation of the global identity of the cultural and executive functions of the EU/HQ with Berlin’s heritage.

Security/Public Space – The Offices of the President of the Council of Europe must adhere to certain security protocols to ensure the safety of the President and his staff. At the same time, the Media Gallery requires a level of publicness to ensure the usability of the cultural program.

Temporality of Program – The Office of the President will only be in Berlin for 6 months.The Media Gallery will remain on the site indefinitely, but must express the goals of the Cultural Capital of Europe project for the first year of its existence.

Physical Permanence – Submissions must design this technology with attention to the problem of monuments and permanence, or at the least landmark – an object that situates the city dwellers mind in space and time. With this type of technology which allows for organic and instantaneous reconstruction, this goes beyond the traditional architectural ambition of creating a “sense of place.”

Symbolic Site Condition – The former occupier of the site, the Palace of the Republic, was taken down in 2006. In its stead, a new symbol has emerged which projects the axis of scientific and intellectual exchange on the unsuspecting pattern of the city. Proposals must address this replacement of a regime of separation and control with an axis of cooperation and progress.
The designer’s protocols can take one of three forms:

Designer/Robot (Scripts/Software) – By handling the material and informational systems of building construction, new robot technology has become the new interface between the designer and the construction site. These robots follow specific behavior protocols that dictate how the robots process environmental inputs into material outputs. This class of protocol takes the form of scripts and software coding.

Person/Person (Codes/Legal Frameworks) – Once space is reprogrammable and computing is ubiquitous, who will be granted the agency to reprogram it? Will it be a purely democratic system following the loose crowdsourcing logic of something like the internet, or are there representatives who communicate with the built fabric? In this context, how shall authoritarian entities be prevented from gaining total control of the system? This class of protocol takes the form of legal codes and laws.

Public/Technology (Biological Traces/Digital Interfaces) – Nano-robotics, in combination with breakthroughs in micro-biology and bio-engineering, allows the physical environment to literally communicate with its inhabitants and the public at large. Should this occur through deliberate means like digital interfaces, or can buildings actually be programmed to understand humans through inherent biological signals?

Submissions must be single images, formatted in 8.5 inches by 11 inches (landscape), 300dpi tiffs. Submissions may (but are not required to) include up to 100 words of text. Applicants may submit more than one entry. All submissions are due by 11:59PM on 22 April 2010.

No registration required.



Share/Save:    Bookmark on Bustler  &  Email this



Comments:
Nanoarchitecture.net
New York City
Saturday, April 17, 2010
There are so many sloppy errors here, the brief needs to be edited and the organizer should have nanotech consultants and researchers involved.

Shewanella do not produce carbon nanotubes, so you should correct this. They have, however, been observed to produce arsenic-sulfide nanotubes. But even the UC Riverside researchers have pointed out that it would be more significant if they could find a bacterial species that could produce better semiconductors.

Nanorobotics has not developed to the point where it is cost-effective for small architectural implementations. In fact, we challenge you to show a us single nanorobotic device that has been implemented in the built environment (i.e., an autonomous but controllable robotic device that is less than 100 nm in at least one dimension).

Nanotubes have not “become the basis for all technology.” The cost of high-quality stock nanotubes is about $175-$225 per gram, and that’s considered cheap. So, nanotubes will continue to emerge in some mass-manufactured consumer products (i.e., in prepreg), but architectural applications will continue to lag (and they certainly aren’t cost-effective for those small architectural implementations you mentioned). Even the Woodrow Wilson Center’s Project on Nanotechnology database only lists about 1000 products that use nanotech. It’s a growing number, but the largest sector is still the cosmetics industry.

ck
Saturday, April 17, 2010
on the other hand this will place in 2040 and lots of thinks could happen by then, so it could be interesting.
it bothers me though that of all these innovations that could take place you're bound to work with the scenario of nano-robots.

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:
Comment:
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Prove you're not a spammer by answering the following question:
What is between "Mies" and "der Rohe"?

  

Featured Competitions:
image
Register/Submit: Nov 1
image
Register: Jul 1 / Submit: Jul 15
image
Register/Submit: Jun 1
image
Register/Submit: May 31
image
Register/Submit: Jul 1
image
Register/Submit: Jun 2
image
Register/Submit: Jun 11
image
Register/Submit: Aug 16

Search Competitions by Keyword:
Advertisement